|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open access
Introduction
As more patients search for health information on the
Internet, many studies have analyzed the quality of health information
available on the web for different pathological conditions. There is a
concern that, because the Internet is practically not controlled or
regulated, this might expose the public to misinformation, particularly
those with low information literacy, which is the ability to critically
appraise the information (1, 2).
This could potentially result in patients turning to non-approved
therapies, whose efficacy (and risks associated) has not been
scientifically proven. Furthermore, in recent years, there have been an
increasing number of commercial websites selling counterfeit medicines,
with additional risks for vulnerable patients (3).
Although there are a number of specialized health
websites, most patients will use generic search engines, such as Google,
to search for health-related information (4), and several studies have tried to address the quality of health information available on the Internet using various methods...............Performing a cluster analysis of websites, based on their classification
and the intervention described, can identify patterns of websites
pointing patients toward one or more treatments. In the specific example
of health-related query studied here, we were surprised that commercial
websites ranked low in the search list. In terms of the type of
intervention recommended, complementary/alternative medicine occurred
more often than approved, EBM-based drugs, but the latter were more
frequent in the top 10 results, possibly due to the intrinsic higher IQ
features of these websites......
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.