|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL ISSUES
The main concerns about follow-up could be summarized as: Who? When? How? And What?
abstract/full text
Article Tools - open access:
Abstract
Objective: The main purpose of this article is to
explore the current practice for follow-up of gynecological cancer,
pointing out the different procedures, to determine the most clinically
and cost-effective surveillance strategies after the primary treatment.
Materials and Methods: We analyzed the follow up
strategies for ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer. All of the
topics discussed below arose from the “ESGO State of Art
Conference—Follow-up in gynaecological malignancies” in Turin,
(September 11–13, 2014; http://torino2014.esgo.org/).
Results: Physical but these practices should be
integrated with biomarkers or imaging strategies. Currently, most
recommendations about follow-up are based on retrospective studies and
expert opinion, and there is some disagreement on surveillance
strategies due to lack of evidence-based knowledge.
Conclusions:
All surveillance procedures should be evidence-based with a clearly
defined purpose: there is a need for prospective studies to compare the
effectiveness of different follow-up regimens measuring overall
survival, detection of recurrence, quality of life (QoL), and costs as
outcomes.
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Your comments?
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.